What Regulators Actually Look For In Emissions Data (not what companies think)

AIREBON
13 Dec 2025
6 min read
Project Photo

Introduction

As emissions reporting requirements increase across the oil and gas sector, many operators assume regulatory risk comes down to one thing: whether their emissions number are “high” or “low”

In reality, regulators are far less concerned with headline figures than most companies realize. What they evaluate instead is data integrity, traceability, and governance. Most enforcement actions and audit failures stem from weak systems, not excessive emissions.

Regulators care more about how data is produced than the number itself

A common misconception is that regulators are primarily looking to penalize companies with high emissions.

In practice, regulators focus on:

  • How emissions data is calculated
  • Whether methodologies are consistent
  • Whether assumptions are documented
  • Whether calculations can be reproduced

If two companies report that same emissions total, the one with clear documentation and defensible methodology is significantly less exposed to regulatory scrutiny.

Traceability is non-negotiable

Regulators expect companies to demonstrate a clear audit trail from operational activity to reported figures.

Regulators look for the following:

  • Consist methodologies year-over-year basis
  • Clear explanations for changes
  • Alignment across internal reports and disclosures

Frequent unexplained changes, even if small, are often flagged as indicators of weak internal controls.

  • Who owns emissions data?
  • Who validates it?
  • Who approves disclosures?

Consistency matters more than precision

Perfect precision is rarely expected. Consistency is.

This entails:

  • Source data identification
  • Calculation logic
  • Version control
  • Internal review and approval steps

When emissions data cannot be traced back to its operational inputs, regulators interpret this as governance failure. Not a clerical error.

Accountability frameworks reduce regulatory risk

One of the most common gaps regulators identify is unclear ownership.

They expect companies to be able to answer:

When accountability is diffuse or undocumented, risk increases, even if numbers appear reasonable.

Most compliance failures are preventable

In AIREBON’S experience, regulatory exposure typically arises not from non-compliance, but from:

  • Fragmented data systems
  • Undocumented processes
  • Lack of internal review workflows
  • Misalignment between operations and reporting

These are structural issues, and they are correctable.

In conclusion

Emissions compliance is not about producing the “right” number. It is about producing a defensible number.

Companies that invest early in data governance, documentation, and workflow design place themselves in a far stronger position with regulators, and counterparties.

AIREBON works with operators to identify emissions data gaps, reporting risks, and compliance exposures before they become regulatory issues.

AIREBON